any demand by any board/person will accomplish other that be ignored by the
parties involved.
Rich Shapiro
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 7:03 AM, Levin RCN <<email obscured>> wrote:
>
> As many of you are aware, the site at 82 Edmands Road has remained in a
> moon-like state for over a year. While the ideal action from our perspective
> is that the permit be rescinded for the RCS School, that is unlikely to
> happen. One of the requirements of the Planning Board approval was that they
> (the School in the normal course of events) put in plantings to help make it
> fit into the character of the neighborhood. When the project stalled,
> neither the school nor the landowner took any such action and by the time
> the Planning Board called them back and threatened sanctions, it was too
> late in the season. (I would assume it is the land owner responsible now
> since this is still in litigation.)
>
>
>
> Amanda Loomis, the PB Administrator, has responded to my concern (as have
> the Precinct 1 City Councilor, Charlie Sisitsky, and the two at-large
> councilors, George King and Cheryl Tully Stoll.) I am forwarding Amanda's
> last response to my request that something be done about this now. It is to
> be on the agenda for the August 9 Planning Board meeting and having Nobscot
> folks there could make a difference.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carol Levin
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Amanda L. Loomis <<email obscured>
> <mailto:<email obscured>> >
>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 1:21 PM
>
> To: C Levin <<email obscured> <mailto:<email obscured>> >
>
> Cc: <email obscured> <mailto:<email obscured>> ;
> <email obscured> <mailto:<email obscured>> ;
> Charles J. Sisitsky <<email obscured>
> <mailto:<email obscured>> >; Manty Shongwe <<email obscured>
> <mailto:<email obscured>> >; Daniel Varley <<email obscured>
> <mailto:<email obscured>> >; Chris Petrini <<email obscured>
> <mailto:<email obscured>> >
>
> Subject: RE: 82 Edmands
>
>
>
> Hi Carol,
>
> Thank you for your email, the Planning Board has been in discussions with
> both parties. Both has stated that no resolution has been reached.
> Therefore, based on this information, the Planning Board will be bringing in
> both the owners of 82 Edmands Road and RCS Learning Center for a discussion
> regarding next steps. This meeting will take place at 7:00pm on Thursday,
> August 9, 2018 - The Planning Board agenda for the respective date will be
> posted later this week.
>
>
>
> In regards to the plantings that are required for the property - this has
> been brought to the attention of the owner's representative. If this
> required item is not complete by the August 9th meeting the Planning Board
> will be addressing that as well.
>
>
>
> Thank you for reaching out and if you could let your abutters know of this
> meeting that would be great, amanda
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: C Levin <<email obscured> <mailto:<email obscured>> >
>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 12:42 PM
>
> To: Amanda L. Loomis <<email obscured>
> <mailto:<email obscured>> >
>
> Cc: <email obscured> <mailto:<email obscured>> ;
> <email obscured> <mailto:<email obscured>> ;
> Charles J. Sisitsky <<email obscured>
> <mailto:<email obscured>> >; Manty Shongwe <<email obscured>
> <mailto:<email obscured>> >; Daniel Varley <<email obscured>
> <mailto:<email obscured>> >
>
> Subject: 82 Edmands
>
>
>
> I have asked several city councilors for an update and received back info
> that the case is still not settled. But I was also told that the PB has said
> the required plantings should be done.
>
>
>
> I would like to know whether any deadline and consequence for not meeting
> that deadline were set and, if so, what they are. The history of the parties
> responding to such requests has been unsatisfactory and there has been no
> consequence to them.
>
>
>
> As abutters confronted with this visual insult daily, we hope and expect
> something happen now.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Carol Levin
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> One Framingham - Focused on the Future
>
> Please be advised that the Massachusetts Secretary of State considers e-mail
> to be a public record, and therefore subject to public access under the
> Massachusetts Public Records Law,M.G.L. c. 66 ยง 10.
>
>
>
>
>
> Carol Levin
> Framingham
> About/contact Carol Levin: http://forums.e-democracy.org/p/carollevin
>
>
> Be sure to read our charter at
http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/framgov/charter.
>
>
> ------------------------
> Reply: Reply-All or visit
http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/22qu7dDHMXCNLxIrHYE0Fo