All posts in the topic [SPED-Team] Changes to the Constitution (Short link)
Summary
- There are 2 posts — by 2 authors — in this topic.
- Latest post made by Charlie Swope at May 15 16:37 UTC
Hi all,
I like the idea of a summary as it is a long document. Maybe a compromise would
be, if after each major part, a summary of the changes to that part could be
inserted.
It looks good up to now.
Gary--- On Thu, 5/15/08, Tim Erickson <tim@e-democracy.org> wrote:
From: Tim Erickson <tim@e-democracy.org>Subject: Re: [SPED-Team] Changes to the
ConstitutionTo: "Mike Fratto" <mfratto@yahoo.com>Cc: "St. Paul E-Democracy
Team" <stpaul-team@forums.e-democracy.org>Date: Thursday, May 15, 2008, 9:43
AMOn May 15, 2008, at 9:39 AM, Mike Fratto wrote:
> It looks okay to me. But I think we need to make sure we include
> strike outs and either underlines or highlights for proposed
> deleted and new language.
I understand.
I was hoping to simply propose to everyone a NEW version of the
constitution with a summary of some of the major changes - BUT, I can
see where it might be better to provide an annotated document showing
all changes (like Charlie and David did).
I just think that the changes are so extensive that this might be
confusing to folks.
Anyone else have any comments on how to present this.
A) Do we list (or highlight) all the detailed changes?
B) Do we present a NEW constitution and by-laws with
summary of key changes that have been made?
Best wishes,
Tim Erickson
Tim Erickson
Hamline Midway
Info about Tim Erickson: http://forums.e-democracy.org/p/timerickson
This topic's messages may be viewed at:
http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/4nBXqdwXgF7n25Ngw7KGi2