For those of you I do not know, my name is David Kaplan. I am a resident of the
Standish neighborhood - formally serving on the SENA Board - and now serving as
the Chair of the Hiawatha Golf Course Property Master Plan Community Advisory
Committee (CAC).
I am writing this open letter to you, my neighbors, and posting it
simultaneously on NextDoor, E-Democracy, the Save Hiawatha Golf Course Facebook
page, the Friends of Lake Hiawatha Facebook page, and am asking MPRB staff to
send it to all CAC members. My hope is to prepare us as a community for the
next CAC meeting, and the work ahead.
As we all know, this project has been steeped in strong opinions - and
rightfully so. This property is complex in how the different communities
interact with it, the emotional and historical connections it has for people,
and the role it plays a rallying point around environmental and ecological
concerns. And we can all agree that there are valid concerns around how to keep
homes dry.
I think it's important that we address the role of the CAC. It is not an
authoritative body. It has no statutory ability to affect change. It is
advisory only. Its role is to provide a handful of options to the MPRB
Commissioners for them to consider, and hopefully choose from, when they make
final design choices on the property. It is essentially the community's
opportunity to say, "based on the larger decisions you (the MPRB Commissioners)
have made, here is how we now want to masterplan the space and here is what is
important to us."
We are not a body that can decide the pumping question. That is the Board of
Commissioners.
What the CAC did do in a 9-6 vote was ask the MPRB Commissioners for
clarification of the original resolution which was poorly written and left much
to the imagination and interpretation, and that we be allowed to look at other
pumping scenarios - essentially asking this newly elected Park Board to
reconsider the decision of the previous one.
The MPRB Commissioners debated this for almost 2 months among themselves I am
told, and at two public meetings. Their response was clear as was their
instructions for the CAC:
Whereas, The Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board (MPRB) is the steward of
Minneapolis parks;
Whereas, Hiawatha Golf Course is a part of the Minneapolis park system and a
component of the Nokomis-Hiawatha Regional Park;
Whereas, The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board adopted Resolution 2017-243
on October 4, 2017;
Whereas, A Community Advisory committee (CAC) was formed to guide a master plan
process for the Hiawatha Golf Course Property according to Resolution 2017-243;
Whereas, On April 30, 2018, the CAC voted to request a clarification of
Resolution 2017- 243 by the Board of Commissioners;
Whereas, Resolution 2017-243, when it was first approved by the Board of
Commissioners, included direction for "strong consideration for traditional
golf in some form on the property" as the CAC explored possibilities through a
master planning process; and
Whereas, Golf stakeholders have noted the importance of Hiawatha Golf Course
and other MPRB golf courses related to the introduction and perpetuation of the
sport for black golfers.
RESOLVED, That the Board of Commissioners clarifies Resolution 2017-243 to
indicate the master planning process shall pursue a reduced pumping scenario as
conceptualized in Alternative B;
RESOLVED, That the Board of Commissioners intends for the CAC to bring forward
a solution resulting from the master planning process that includes, at a
minimum, a flood-resilient and ecologically-driven nine-hole configuration for
a golf course on the property;
RESOLVED, That the Board of Commissioners intends for the CAC to reflect in the
master plan appropriate methods of recognizing the role of Hiawatha Golf Course
and the history of black golfers in the Minneapolis park system; and
RESOLVED, That the President of the Board and Secretary to the Board are
authorized to take all necessary administrative actions to implement this
resolution.
Rest of post
___
The response clearly states that "master planning process shall pursue a
reduced pumping scenario as conceptualized in Alternative B" which was the plan
proposed that reduces pumping to from 242 MGY to around 94 MGY.
And within those confines of pumping reduction, we are to look at developing a
plan that "includes, at a minimum, a flood-resilient and ecologically-driven
nine-hole configuration for a golf course on the property" and one that has
"appropriate methods of recognizing the role of Hiawatha Golf Course and the
history of black golfers in the Minneapolis park system."
Some community members like this compromise, some do not. But that was clearly
going to be the case for any decision made by the MPRB Commissioners. In the
end, it is their legal right and their statutory duty as elected officials to
make this decision, it's why we elect them. And for those who do not agree with
the decision, there are appropriate avenues to go down to address your concerns
- through electoral or legal means. But the CAC is not one of those.
It is time for the CAC to begin its work - to start the lengthy process of
master planning the site under the conditions set forth by the MPRB
Commissioners. Should something change through the appropriate methods, then
the CAC can change its direction as well. But we can no longer spin our wheels
and waste tax dollars on a stagnant process. We all signed up to do this work.
The application page was clear in our role:
The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) is seeking applications from
the general public to serve on the Community Advisory Committee (CAC) for the
Hiawatha Golf Course Property Master Plan. This planning project will guide
capital improvements, management and operations within the golf course
property.
In June of 2014, over 11 inches of rain fell on Hiawatha Golf Course and caused
$1.5 million in damage. Parts of the damage has been restored, but elevated the
necessity for a future flood resiliency plan. During the flood resiliency
planning effort, the MPRB discovered it was pumping a volume of groundwater
significantly greater than the amount allowed through a groundwater
appropriations permit issued by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
This discovery put the planning effort on hold and triggered an intensive
groundwater and stormwater study for the area, completed in 2017.
The Hiawatha Golf Course Property Master Plan will restart the planning process
and will align water management strategies with potential future uses of the
golf course property, including a consideration of traditional golf in some
form and other current uses on the property.
The CAC will work with MPRB staff and consultants over the next 12 months to
make recommendations to MPRB Commissioners. Project details and CAC
applications are linked below.
____
At the next meeting, I plan to begin the master planning process, to bring in
our consultants who have been waiting for months, and we will begin with a
visioning exercise. It is vital that we start this project, and I intend to see
that it does begin.
Continued failure on the CAC's part to start the process may have very real,
lasting effects. Most important of those, is that the CAC process is not a
requirement of the MPRB. They do it because they value community involvement,
but they can also, if we continue to ignore our charge and duties, choose to
dissolve us and move forward with master planning without a CAC. I remind us
all that Meadowbrook did not have a CAC - and that having one for Hiawatha is
an anomaly, not the standard.
The community would lose its voice, its input, and its collective say in the
matter. Each CAC member was appointed to represent a community or an
organization. If we fail to represent them, and we give over control of the
planning, we have failed our neighbors and our communities.
When we meet in (hopefully) September, we will be 6 months into a proposed
12-month process with no actual master planning work done. That must change.
I ask that the CAC follow my lead and we move into master planning at the next
meeting. I ask that the community come and participate in the process and
provide your input on the visioning process at the end of the meeting. And I
ask that those who wish to see another direction use the appropriate vehicles
to do so - the CAC is not the appropriate location or place to air grievances
anymore, the MPRB Commissioners have been clear in their direction.
I look forward to working with you all in the coming months.
David Kaplan
Standish resident
CAC Chair