how right he is. Wouldnât want the world to change too drastically.
And itâs also nice that he has gathered the meaning of those high schoolers
when they say âI call BS onâ [fill in blank].
Itâs unfortunate that it happened as he laid a bunch of BS on us. And I see
John continues with BS about the poor deprived people under 18. But he never
dealt with info I sent or questions.
Some people are always going to be right, especially if they have God on their
side, and if they continue to ignore anything that shows differently.
An example would be banning half our guns and setting stage for banning the
rest. Well, that pure conjecture, I think a bit, or lot of paranoid, but still
pure BS fear mongering.. Love the words âeventuallyâ and âsetting stageâ. Not
happening? I suppose I can say that just as easily, if not much more so, based
on past results. Or, âyah, in your headâ.
Already pointed out 18 year old BS to no avail.
By the way, yes, more guns on bottom of Mille Lacs, the better. Keep up the
good work. But thatâs JMO.
Best I can tell Eden Prairie is considering a resolution that could ask
businesses selling firearms in the city to consider not selling assault weapons
and not to sell to people under age 21. No storm troopers yet. Thatâs of April
18th.
All measures have failed. More BS. However what is not BS by Mitch is that We
are at a fifty year low point in gun homicides and crime. And there has been a
50% reduction in the last twenty years. And this has all happened while gun
ownership has increased. (Mitch again tells poster he was probably too dumb to
know that despite it being noted here number of times)
And thatâs good. And yet we remain the Neanderthal on the block. And yet our
gun crimes and gun homicides remain astronomically higher, often magnitudes
higher, than our peers elsewhere in the world. And what do they have? Well one
of those things they have is those gun control laws containing all those
provisions noted by Mitch as âall of them failedâ.
Now they canât be the only reason. Another would be gun ownership. No one comes
close to the insanity we have of approximately one gun per person. Canada is
the closest, I think, with thirty guns per hundred. And not surprisingly they
are the closest to us in gun deaths, having only Âź to 1/8, depending on what
you read, of our gun deaths.
Gun ownership level could be huge reason. US crime rates, while higher, arenât
out of the park with other peer country crime rates. Just the gun deaths. Well,
we all like our guns, right?
And yep, Iâve mentioned that a lot; as much as Mitch has talked about the 50%
decline. What the hell.
On a much more interesting note, maybe fun, Iâd refer you to this comics piece.
Donât go there if effing this and effing that disturbs you badly
If link doesnât work, just look up Jim Jefferies. Anti gunners will laugh ( he
is a comedienne) a lot thru the whole thing. So the can enjoy it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9UFyNy-rw4&list=RDa9UFyNy-rw4&t=460
Thereâs a part one and part two. Itâs about the only thing youâll see here
thatâs kinda new. Iâd enjoyed it.
This could be Saturday morning cartoons, except its Friday.
P.S. It sounded weird so I couldnât resist noting that law abiding civilians
probably committed zero crimes before 1934 also.
P.S.S. I could have copied conversation on this state or national issue from
SPIF, or even responded there. But I couldnât. You can go there and read it
though. I couldnât because I didnât feel like humoring them, and Iâm kinda
hiding out here. I donât believe we're having a real conversation about the
issues. Mostly repeating or that digital spittle someone mentioned. Have fun
with links. Sorry about language but thatâs today.
Hey, I forgot about some more jokes, that joke gun rights / second amendment
rights / human rights issue.
Yes, gun rights are being equated with human rights. More BS. The connection?
The human right to self defense. Which I'm not arguing about. Hell, I'm not
arguing period.
Second amendment rights would be civic rights, something John remains careful
in noting (way to go!). The human right of self defense is a bit more
undefined. You jump on the web and you'll find nut cases saying this human
right included rights to machine guns, grenades, etc. It's self defense, right?
On flip side maybe it's just the right to hire a police force? Or an army?
Don't know. Hard to say the human right, which is innate, and always been
there, is gun rights, as it was around before guns. But also around after
drones. Could be confusing. And why not, as the whole move to label second
amendment rights, which are civic rights, as human rights, is just so much
pulling the wool over your eyes. More bad humor being propagated.
Thought I'd throw it in.