Perhaps "underrepresented"? It is not so much what others are doing for
them, it is whether everyone is included to begin with.
them, it is whether everyone is included to begin with.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 1:31 PM Phil Shapiro <<email obscured>> wrote:
>
> At a conference I attended last week in DC, I heard the phrase
> "underestimated groups" used more often than "underserved groups."
>
> While it's true that many underestimated groups are underserved -- their
> chief characteristic is that they are underestimated.
>
> I'm going to try to use the "underestimated" designation more often -- and
> reduce my usage of "underserved."
>
> phil
>
> --
> Phil Shapiro, <email obscured>
> http://www.his.com/pshapiro/briefbio.html
> http://www.twitter.com/philshapiro
> http://www.his.com/pshapiro/stories.menu.html
>
> "Wisdom begins with wonder." - Socrates
> "Learning happens thru gentleness."
> "We must reinvent a future free of blinders so that we can choose from
> real options." David Suzuki
>
>
> Phil Shapiro
> Cheverly, Cheverly
> About/contact Phil Shapiro: http://forums.e-democracy.org/p/philshapiro
>
>
>
> ------------------------
> Reply: Reply-All or visit
> http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/16Ik7wflFPM7l8uwlqKnqY
> New Topic: inclusion@forums.e-democracy.org
> Digest: Subject: digest on
> Leave: Subject: unsubscribe
> Forum Home: http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/inclusion
>
>
>
>
> Help? http://e-democracy.org/support Hosting: http://OnlineGroups.Net
>
>
>