All posts in the topic RNC: my letter to the Heffelfinger commission (Short link)
Summary
- There are 4 posts — by 3 authors — in this topic.
- Latest post made by HINE Hine at Nov 19 21:33 UTC
(Since I had to work last Thursday night when testimony was being taken
regarding the RNC, my only choice was to send my comments to them via email.
Note: Comments are being accepted only through today, 11/14,08, by emailing
lucie.passus (at) stpaul (dot) gov The following is my letter.)
One of the saddest fatalities of the Republican National Convention was the
previously good community policing by the St. Paul Police Department.
No department is perfect, of course, but the basic relationship between the
Twin Cities peace community and the St. Paul Police Department was unusual for
the ongoing tone of mutual respect. Even when peace people were performing
acts of non-violent civil disobedience and were therefore arrested, the
bilateral understanding was that each side was doing its job as professionally
as possible. Peace people understood that the police had the job of arresting
them for any illegal acts, however non-violent. Police often agreed with the
political goals of the protesters if not the tactics, and the police almost
always understood that even civil disobedience was devoid of any danger to
civic order or to their own personal security.
Against this backdrop, a meeting was held nearly a year before the convention,
specifically to calm any concerns about the upcoming convention.
On October 23, 2007, the Minnesota Alliance of Peacemakers and the University
of St Thomas Justice and Peace Department invited the St Paul police to discuss
the upcoming Republican National Convention. It was absolutely amazing to look
back on the promises made and compare them to what actually happened. Let's
review.
Assistant St Paul Police Chief Matt Bostrom promised that St Paul would
absolutely NOT be a repeat of Seattle 1999. He said that we would not be
following the brutal and repressive "Miami model" from the 2003 FTAA protests,
but that there would be a warm and welcoming "St Paul model" for all to see. He
said that what got him out of bed in the morning was his abiding concern for
civil liberties.
Bostrom promised that there absolutely nobody would be arrested unless they
committed a specific crime, that there would not been any general sweeps.
(Fact: There were actually three mass arrests for "being in the wrong place at
the wrong time," on Shepard Road September 1, after the
Rage-Against-the-Machine concert in Minneapolis on September 3, and on the
Marion Street bridge on September 4.)
Bostrom promised the police officers would be readily identifiable and wearing
regular police uniforms, not tactical gear. (Fact: Nearly all "security"
personnel were clad in black "ninja turtle" suits, with no unit or personal
identification visible, and even covered up so much that it was usually
impossible to determine gender.)
Bostrom promised there might be some changes in traffic patterns, but there
would be absolutely no restrictions in foot traffic. (Fact: Nearly every bridge
near St Paul was closed at one point or another, and major parts of the
downtown area were blockaded on each day of the convention.)
Bostrom promised that all "security" would be under the supervision of the St
Paul Police Department and that any other jurisdictions cooperating with the
event would be "partnered" with St Paul officers and under the direct control
of the St Paul Police Department. (No contradicting "facts" here, but I have
yet to meet a single person who concluded that St Paul Police controlled
security of the convention. Most would speculate that Ramsey County Sheriff Bob
Fletcher was in immediate control, but that the general direction was
determined by some anonymous federal agency.)
Matt Bostrom declared there would be absolutely no restrictions on free speech
and that, in fact, the entire city of St Paul would be a "free speech zone."
(Fact: You couldn't even get to the "public expression" zone most evenings of
the convention, because the streets were blocked by menacing lines of
black-clad individuals in riot gear.)
Bostrom said that there would be permits granted in advance, but that officers
on the scene would also be able to grant permits "on the fly." (Fact: The
Thursday march permit was actually revoked "on the fly" and nearly 400 people
were later arrested as they attempted to march to the Xcel Center.)
Bostrom promised that St Paul police would not let federal agents "go after
people." (This might be technically true, if all those preventative arrests
were at the initiative of Bob Fletcher and not merely Fletcher acting on behalf
of some federal agency.)
Bostrom promised that protesters would be able to confront the Republicans
within "sight and sound" in accordance with previous court rulings. (Fact:
Thursday's march was specifically prohibited from going crossing Interstate 94
or going anywhere near the Xcel Center.)
Bostrom promised that there would be no massive holding pens or arrest quotas
of 3,000 people. (Fact: False on the holding pens, but technically correct on
the quota number, since only about 800 were actually arrested. It should be
mentioned, however, that many more were tased and especially pepper-sprayed
than any previous similar event.)
Bostrom said that there were "no plans" to infiltrate any groups. (Fact: Recent
court records relating to search warrants indicated that infiltration had
actually started at least the month before, probably under the supervision of
the Ramsey County Sheriff's office.)
Bostrom indicated that no private security would be hired. (Both Pioneer Press
and Star Tribune reported that a million dollars was approved by the St Paul
City Council for private security.)
I have saved the most interesting promise for last. Professor Gerald Schlabach
of the St Thomas Justice and Peace Department asked Chief Matt Bostrom a very
serious question toward the end of the evening. Schlabach wondered how Bostrom
would react if St Paul lost control of the convention security to a different
agency and if all of the promises were broken. Gerald Schlabach asked Chief
Bostrom if Bostrom would resign.
Matt Bostrom thought quietly for a good long moment. He didn't answer in a way
that seemed impulsive or off-the-cuff. Bostrom seemed to really consider the
question quite seriously before answering. Then Bostrom answered quite simply
that he would resign. (Fact: Bostrom is still employed as Assistant Chief of
the St Paul Police Department. Like the other promises, this one was broken.)
The video of that evening’s presentation is not in my possession, but I have
been able to determine where it is and I believe I could obtain a copy for any
investigators who have even the slightest interest in reviewing the false
promises that officials in St. Paul made prior to the convention.
It is not my intention to criticize only Chief Matt Bostrom. The problem is
much greater than one person, of course. His was the public face of the many
official lies and broken promises surrounding the RNC.
Those of us who witnessed many of the events in St. Paul during that time saw
numerous cases of arbitrary arrests, arbitrary pepper-spray, massive
intimidation of non-violent protest through the use of anonymous and riot-clad
officers with lethal batons and less-lethal weapons deployed during legal and
permitted protests.
Those of us on the streets during those days (I myself was volunteering as a
street medic during most of the convention) have spoken to many bystanders who
were pepper-sprayed or arrested, sometimes while specifically obeying police
orders. Those of us with computers and internet access have seen the videos of
wanton police violence against the non-violent.
Here’s the problem. The St. Paul Police Department and the Ramsey County
Sheriff’s Office have chosen to protect themselves from any accountability to
the public. They have chosen to do this by donning anonymous riot uniforms,
disguising not only personal identity, but masking the actual units of the
officers as well. It thus became impossible to link any excessive violence
with any particular individual, police department or other agency. They have
also done this by refusing to release the thousands of hours of videotape to
citizen groups or even lawyers defending their clients. They have refused to
apologize or even investigate any police misconduct, preferring to close ranks
behind the myth that everything was just fine.
It is also quite amazing that absolutely no information has been released
regarding most of the actual violations of law. I have tried for many hours,
for example, to discover if any charges were pending against the individual who
broke the Macy’s window on September 1 and the individuals who broke the squad
car windows on September 1. I have called the St. Paul City Attorney’s Office,
the St. Paul Police, the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office, and the Ramsey County
Prosecutor’s Office. There has been a complete stonewalling, in spite of the
fact that these two incidents where the ones used to justify the massive police
violence that we witnessed during those days.
The general belief in the community is that these incidents will not be charged
because they were done by provocateurs. I have no idea if the majority of the
property destruction was committed by those on the police payroll, or if there
is some other explanation for the lack of arrests for actual breakage. I only
know that there were hundreds and hundreds of officers in the area of each
incident, that these crimes are not even being mentioned at this point.
And I know that only the more speculative and political crime of “conspiracy”
is being mentioned through official outlets. In this world, graywater becomes
“weaponized” urine and old tires or roofing nails become weapons.
Perhaps it is a foregone conclusion that police officers will protect their own
regardless of the law, much like Mafia omerta or other gang loyalty. There will
be a heavy price to pay, however, if this is the eventual conclusion. Police
will be seen exclusively as the protectors of the powerful, rather than the
protectors of the people. Police will be seen as dangerous. Police will be
seen as the enemy, merely because they have chosen to treat peaceful citizens
as the enemy.
If we are to return to a model of community policing, if we are to have the
police be protectors of the people and enforcers of the law, rather than
lawless enforcers of terroristic official power, then we must right a few
wrongs committed during the convention. I have several suggestions.
First, drop all charges against those rounded up in the mass arrests on Shepard
Road, on the Marion Street bridge and in Minneapolis after the Rage concert;
charge only those who committed actual acts of violence against people or
damage against property. Drop all charges that have to do with being “in the
wrong place at the wrong time.”
Second, drop all the conspiracy charges. These are thought crimes, open to
whim, influence and paranoia. Charge only those who committed actual violence.
Third, conduct real, open hearings into citizen complaints of police violence.
Let there be sworn testimony and the possibility of criminal charges where
actual assaults have occurred.
Fourth, dismiss all police and sheriff’s officers who have made false
statements in their reports. Have their statements be evaluated for criminal
prosecution.
Fifth, examine the legality of anonymous policing. Those black ninja outfits
have no place in a democracy, and my understanding is that there are already
state laws that prohibit such practices.
Sixth, immediately secure all video evidence during the convention so that none
may be erased or destroyed. Release such evidence to all lawyers representing
defendants, to all journalists of any description, and to the general public at
large (perhaps through internet access).
Seventh, give some explanation as to why such illegal intimidation and massive
use of chemical weapons was allowed to occur. This wasn’t the plan. What
happened?
Last, apologize. Minnesotans are a kind and forgiving people. Mistakes will
happen. But most of us hate lies and we love our freedom. We have heard a lot
of lies and lost a lot of freedom. A sincere apology by at least two mayors,
one police chief and a sheriff would go a long way.
Sincerely, Charles Underwood
The only purpose of a "Twin Cities peace community" is to steal credit for
whatever peace transpires and which police, in their modest professionalism, do
not claim responsibility for. The only reason violence happened was the
presence of violent protesters supported by the "Twin Cities peace community".
Attacking our police and questioning their tactics while supporting the violent
protesters they are attempting to control is insipid audacity.
Undermining the police by extracting "commitments" and promises before the
convention is shameful.
Street medics in their rag tag outfits who refuse to identify themselves or be
photographed are theatrical instigators by their very nature.
Did you know the Republicans this year will line item veto all funding to the
Secretary of State until he acquieces to photo ID requirements at registration?
This will affect all counties including St. Paul's Ramsey county. Maybe that
can be the next political agenda item.
There are a lot of people like Bostrom and Fletcher, who have the audacity of
trying to improve the quality of government service. These good people, like
those trying to improve the voter registration process, are the victims you
stalk when you seek to disrupt their effort in the name of some misguided
ill-conceived concept of human or voter rights.
Jamie Delton
Summit U
Pardon Ramos & Campion!
Jamie, a few points:
You describe the RNC street medics as "rag tag outfits who refuse to identify
themselves or be
photographed are theatrical instigators by their very nature." Jamie, I was a
street medic. I chose that role for the convention because I did not want to
be in confrontation with any police/deputies/agents. I wanted to help people
out who were hurt, no matter who they were. As it turned out, I didn't end up
treating any police officers, since they were the ones inflicting the violence
on others, but I did help a number of others. It is, in fact, difficult for me
to understand how providing first aid makes me an "instigator" in any way.
You may not like my clothing choices, which admittedly tend toward Savers, but
I was clearly not refusing to be identified or photographed. If you want, you
can see my picture in the September 2 Strib over the caption that says "Charley
Underwood." So that is a correction of fact.
The biggest problem I have, however, is with your use of the term "violence."
I saw quite a few attacks on people by the black-clad "security" people, but I
didn't see a single case by any protesters at all. I don't say that it didn't
happen. But I will say again, as I have said in great detail before, that I
think that any illegal acts should be prosecuted for the actual laws that were
broken, not some status offense of thought crimes or "conspiracy."
The "violence" that it most cited as justification for the massive police
repression of that week is not violence against people at all. It is the
breakage of the Macy's window and the vandalism of the police patrol car, both
occurring on September 1. But, as I have pointed out, city and county
attorneys, police and sheriff's office, all seem completely disinclined to
prosecute these actual violations of the law. Not one official that I have
called (and I have called nearly 20) will tell me if there are charges in those
incidents. So I am left to conclude that their main importance was in
justifying police violence to the public.
Do you truly believe that spokespeople for the police department have no
obligation to tell the truth? Please remember that these Matt Bostrom promises
were made in the context of an active public relations campaign to calm the
public and assure the public that the convention would cause no disruption at
all. Which was at very least a promise which was broken.
But let's talk about violence. Do you truly believe that police should be
forgiven for any violence under any circumstances? I can tell you that I
personally know quite a few cases where police pepper-sprayed or otherwise
assaulted those who were not threatening anyone in any way. In some cases, the
main justification for spaying seemed to be that it was an attractive young
woman who happened to be nearby.
I ask you quite simply: Does wearing a police uniform (or covering it up with
black riot gear in this case) excuse a person from all crimes? Can they
therefore pepper-spray at will? Are they allowed to tase people when that
person is peaceful and compliant? Can you shot someone in the back, for
example, simply because you have been issued a weapon?
Your tag line ("Pardon Ramos and Campion") indicated that you believe that, in
fact, the uniform absolves a person from all compliance with the law. That
particular officer was convicted of murder for shooting a fellow human being in
the back. So I guess that about covers it.
I could not disagree with you more. I have, on occasion, been given a speeding
ticket. Each time that has happened (about 4 times in 46 years of driving), I
have thanked the officer for doing his job. Because I believe that I should
obey the law. And, if I believe that the laws are unjust, then I believe that
I should be prepared to accept punishment for breaking them, just as I did in
the South in civil rights cases and in the North for Vietnam related protests.
I believe in the rule of law. You apparently do not. Or at least you believe
that police officers are above the law and that questioning their illegal
tactics or criminal behavior is somehow not allowed.
Please let me know if I have any of this wrong. Please let me know if you
think there is a police behavior so reprehensible that the officer should
receive the same punishment as the rest of us mortals.
"I suppose it is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail." - Abraham Maslow, 1908-1970 "(Hine) discovers that the apes, who can talk, are in control and are divided into a strict class system: the gorillas as police, military, and hunters; the orangutans as administrators, politicians and lawyers; and the chimpanzees as intellectuals and scientists. Humans, who cannot talk, are considered feral vermin and are hunted and used for scientific experimentation." - a Forbidden Zone Moment during the RNC, when I looked out of the "Blue Tube" Control Room on 1 Sep 08 and saw something straight out of a movie; borrowed from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_of_the_Apes_(1968_film) AMH Ward Two Andrew M. Hine 3M IATD Industrial Adhesives & Tapes Division 3M Center 230-1F-35 St. Paul MN 55144-1000 USA <email obscured> Tel: (651) 733-1070 Fax: (651) 737-2003 "Jamie Delton" <jd@tcinternet.net> 11/18/2008 01:30 AM To "St. Paul Issues Forum" <stpaul-issues@forums.e-democracy.org> cc Subject Re: [SPIF] RNC: my letter to the Heffelfinger commission