Today's Star Tribune has a front page follow-up to the story that ran April 7.
The headline on my paper version of the paper reads "Education nonprofit hopes
cash closes gaps." The online version of the story today has the headline
"Minnesota Comeback takes new aim at Minneapolis achievement gaps - Group gives
$2.7M to aid diversity in Mpls. schools."
Now, I'm going to guess that somebody other than Alejandra Matos, who's byline
is on the story, wrote those headlines. Those headlines are odd for a couple of
reasons. The first is that the headlines don't convey the point of this
follow-up story which was that there is "opposition from a small but vocal
group of Minneapolis residents and one Minneapolis school board member." Now,
I'm not sure just how 'small' or vocal that group is. Is it small in comparison
to the group that of residents that supports giving $1.7 million to charters
for a real estate office? Just how many people in Minneapolis are supportive of
giving $1.7 million to charters for a real estate office? Count me a one person
in that group that opposes giving $1.7 million to charters for a real estate
office? I'm willing to bet that group gets bigger.
The headline that says "nonprofit hopes cash closes gaps" is interesting
because of the word 'hopes.' I'm more than a little surprised that the $2.7
million is being spent hoping that it makes a difference? But, I suppose that
is reasonable since I'm not sure where they'd find evidence to support giving
$1.7 million to charters for a real estate office as a way to actually close
any kind of gap.
Then, there's the part of the headline that says "Comeback takes new aim at
Minneapolis achievement gaps." Let's ignore what they might be meaning with the
name, 'Comeback,' and consider 'new aim.' What was there old aim and why didn't
it work? Again, is there any evidence to support this 'new aim' ?
The "key strategies: increasing the diversity of teachers in the city, engaging
families and expanding high-quality schools" is not something new. The MPS has
been saying that they want to do that since way before they hired me over 20
years ago. So, what's the new aim"?
The sub-headline, "$2.7M to aid diversity in Mpls. schools" is really deceptive
if not just plain wrong. How is giving $1.7 million to charters for a real
estate office aiding diversity? And, is giving $.5 million to a couple of
existing charters really aiding diversity? It seems to me to be simply aiding
charter schools.
Ok, that was the headlines. Now, for the meat of the story, "Bill Graves, CEO
of the John & Denise Graves Foundation, said he and his family fund donated
nearly $300,000. They support Comeback because it gives them the chance to have
a bigger impact by focusing on the same big-picture initiatives as other
foundations." Graves didn't say anything about a new aim or diversity. He's
talking about getting to be like the big kids of philanthropy. It probably
also enables him and his family feel good to be doing something for education
instead of supporting it through higher taxes on the wealthy.
And the other meat of the story is a report on a conversation that Michael Goar
and Al Fan had after Goar sent Fan a letter last October. So, this isn't really
'news.' Goar is said to have said "he now sees that Comeback is committed to
supporting the district’s vision of giving individual schools more control of
major decisions and investing in quality school leaders and teachers." I guess
the implication there is that without the help of these rich people that wanna
be like other rich people the MPS would not be investing in quality school
leaders and teachers. There's more than a few problems with Goar's new found
support of this group of rich people that wanna be like other rich people. The
first is that Goar was the head of a company that did exactly what MinnComeback
does before he became a superintendent wannabe in the MPS. The second is that
he will very likely go to work for another group of rich people that wanna be
like other rich people in a few months or go to work for a charter chain.
Which brings me to think that Goar's support is probably even more reason to
believe that MINNcomeback's goal to create 30,000 “rigorous and relevant”
classroom seats means that Comeback wants to shift the 36,000 students from
Minneapolis district schools into charter schools.
Anybody else want to join the group that opposes "the shift of 30,000 students
from Minneapolis district schools into charter schools" ?