Fw: Canterbury Energy strategy
From:
Brian Sandle
Date:
Jun 24 22:56 UTC
Short link
Tim Kerr wrote:
>
>> Interesting comment Brian. I don't actually argue "keep the price down and
>> people will use more..." I really mean "If the price is low enough more
>> people will use it." Quite a difference.
>> Cheers,
>> Tim Kerr.
>>
But clothing can be very cheap so why don't people use more of that?
Years ago I requested of TVNZ that announcers dressed very warmly, as an
example to suggest watchers might also. How are they doing? I suppose
it's not very marketish.
It's hard to take the bull by the horns and overcome what people think
of you. Mother encouraged me to wear to primary school a wollen bonnet
with ear flaps, which received some nuisance comments form schoolmates.
A dust mask or even a couple of handkerchiefs tied around the nose can
keep it warm. A motorcycle cold weather mask could be better. Maybe
there are ones with proper heat exchangers between outgoing and incoming
air. Fresh air - oxygen helps us to want to breath and so work the
metabolism. So heat capturing-exchanging ventillators in our bedrooms
could help.
My metabolism does not work so well if I eat too much wheat product and
I can get cold extremities. Perhaps some substances in wheat are
haemagglutinins for ny type of blood. I note that blood typing labs can
use certain plant substances to determine the blood type by finding if
they agglutinate that sample. Or excess sugary fruit of some types may
not be good. Perhaps it encourages too much blood sugar which is a nerve
problem.
My power bill does not eat into my disposable income as much as my
communications bill.
Might try to get to:
Event: *Public Talk: An overview of the resource consents process with
reference to the Central Plains Water Scheme*
Speaker: Donald Fraser, Consents Hearing officer, ECAN
Where: Canterbury WEA, 59 Gloucester Street
When: Wednesday 25 June, 1.30 - 2.30pm.
Cost: $4.
Contact: Phone 366 0285. All welcome!
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Brian Sandle" <bsandle@snap.net.nz>
>> To: <canterburyissues@forums.e-democracy.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 5:27 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Canterbury Issues] Canterbury Energy strategy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Produce more, keep the price down and someone will go ahead and use
>>> more, sort of a Tim's argument. We will be back where we were.
>>>
>>> Say we increase production by 5%. But then I see there is application
>>> for apartments in Marine Pde/Union St: "It is considered that the
>>> requirement for areas to provide for washing lines and the like are not
>>> practical for multi unit apartment living.." I think that will eat up 5%
>>> of a power bill.
>>>
.