Post in Fwd: Re: Bridge relocation
Topic Navigation
Useful Links
Fwd: Re: Bridge relocation From: Leslie Hittner Date: Jun 24 22:48 UTC Short link
I was thinking of that just yesterday. I don't know for sure but
I think that the "underbridge" framing might be less bulky. If
so, it might allow the bridge driving surface to be lower - thus
shortening the access ramps.
It would be prettier too.
-Leslie Hittner
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Sebo" <bobsebo@hbci.com> To: <winona@forums.e-democracy.org>; "Randy Schenkat" <schenkat@mail.hbci.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 17:22 Subject: Re: [Winona] Fwd: Re: Bridge relocation > This is my third post for the day...I'm sorry > > Anyone else interested in the idea of a suspension bridge? :-) > > Why not pursue good architecture as well as excellence in function. > > Bob Sebo > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Randy Schenkat" <schenkat@mail.hbci.com> > To: <winona@forums.e-democracy.org> > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 4:45 PM > Subject: [Winona] Fwd: Re: Bridge relocation > > > > What happens to all this wisdom that is being offered in this thread > > on Bridge Relocation? How does this Bridge process work..who > > solicits input-- is it the City, County, MDOT, our State Reps? How > > many other ideas are there? Could one of the local papers > > synthesize what's been shared to date, write a story about it, and > > ask others to comment? Could some one from WOD write a synthesis > > with a reaction section and subscribers send it on to others in > > Winona not subscribed to WOD for their feedback? > > > > Other ideas on getting something to happen with all the good ideas > > being shared? > > > > Randy Schenkat > > > >>X-Original-To: <email obscured> > >>Delivered-To: <email obscured> > >>X-Original-To: <email obscured> > >>Delivered-To: <email obscured> > >>X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vida.onlinegroups.net > >>X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at hbci.com > >>From: "Bob Sebo" <bobsebo@hbci.com> > >>To: "Paul Double" <pdouble@hbci.com>, > >> <winona@forums.e-democracy.org> > >>Subject: Re: [Winona] Bridge relocation > >>Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:10:42 -0500 > >>X-Priority: 3 > >>List-Post: mailto:winona@forums.e-democracy.org > >>List-Id: winona > >>X-BeenThere: <email obscured> > >>X-Loop: <email obscured> > >>X-Archive-Id: 46OJ3YCgNPAoMp7JRrKBOn > >>X-GSUser-Id: bobsebo > >>X-pstn-neptune: 5/1/0.20/54 > >>X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 CV:99.0000 R:95.9108 > >>P:95.9108 M:90.4903 C:99.5902 ) > >>X-pstn-settings: 5 (2.0000:2.0000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c > >>X-pstn-addresses: from <bobsebo@hbci.com> [1761/74] > >> > >>Actually, Paul...I believe (and fervently hope) that MnDOT's job is to > >>facilitate the movement of people and goods and services, not cars and > >>trucks. That may seem like splitting hairs given our current reliance on > >>cars and trucks, but the fact that surfaced recently that the state > >>doesn't > >>even consider ferry service a form of transit...it reminds me of how much > >>we > >>take for granted that our roads and bridges will always look like they do > >>today. I thnk that would be a mistake. > >> > >>I think MnDOT will try to build the cheapest bridge they can and be done > >>with it. This community, however, may well live with the new bridge for a > >>century. We have to fight for the best solution for us. Something that > >>comes to mind as we think about a new bridge downtown is that it will be > >>much more pedestrian and bicycle friendly there than on Pelzer or Mankato. > >>We are hoping for an increase in bike tourism via the new Wisconsin trail > >>connection to Latsch Island...just think if we had a 15 foot bike lane > >>instead of that agoraphobic (yet arguably simultaneously claustrohobic) > >>nightmare of a sidewalk on the existing bridge? Build it and they will > >>come? I don't know but cycling is a growing tourism sector and we've got > >>the country (and the river) to take advantage of it. Such a feature could > >>also accomodate mobility scooters, segways...who knows what the big thing > >>will be in 2035...but it would be great if the bridge was flexible and > >>multipurpose since it will still be the only one we have. > >> > >>That bike pedestrian lane could peel off into Levee Park, even. It's not > >>all just about cost and eminent domain. We need a bridge that will work > >>for > >>the city...a simple new straight shot bridge doesn't cut it for me. With > >>this project we could remove ALL through truck traffic from downtown...can > >>you imagine what that would mean? It's not like MnDOT overspends in > >>Winona...and more than most cities Winona is fracture critical...if our > >>bridge breaks the rest of the community goes down with it...we've learned > >>that first hand. > >> > >>Bob Sebo > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> MNDOT has the responsibility to move vehicles both cars and trucks > >>> efficiently and safe. I believe that is their primary job and that is > >>> why > >>> it is important to provide them with input so long as that input fits > >>> their > >>> mission. Cost is part of efficiency and should a location or design > >>> embrace > >>> that I would see not logical reason that they would also agree to keep > >>> and > >>> open mind so that all parties and idea are on the table for > >>> consideration. > >> > > >>> The situation we have now is terrible at best. The only thing worse > >>> was > >>> the > >>> bridge the current on replaced or the full closure we had this month. > >>> Keep > >>> traffic flow, construction cost including eminent domain, safety, > >>> relocation > >>> and removal of homes at the top of the list and I think we will find > >>> MNDOT > >>> to be receptive and supportive. > >>> > >>> Paul Double > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Paul Double > >>> > >>> Info about Paul Double: http://forums.e-democracy.org/p/pauldouble > >>> > >>> This topic's messages may be viewed at: > >>> http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/2bwY1RsO9aFkeGUS76J3NF > >>> ----------------------------------------- > >>> To post, send your message to: <email obscured> > >>> To leave or for daily digest, type "unsubscribe" or "digest on," > >>> in subject line and send to: <email obscured> > >>> > >>> More info about Winona Online Democracy: > >>> http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/winona > >>> > >>> E-Democracy.Org rules: http://e-democracy.org/rules > >>> ----------------------------------------- > >>> Technical assistance thanks to our friends at http://OnlineGroups.Net > >> > >> > >>Bob Sebo > >>East End, Winona > >>Info about Bob Sebo: http://forums.e-democracy.org/p/bobsebo > >> > >>This topic's messages may be viewed at: > >>http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/46OJ3YCgNPAoMp7JRrKBOn > >>----------------------------------------- > >> To post, send your message to: <email obscured> > >> To leave or for daily digest, type "unsubscribe" or "digest on," > >> in subject line and send to: <email obscured> > >> > >> More info about Winona Online Democracy: > >> http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/winona > >> > >> E-Democracy.Org rules: http://e-democracy.org/rules > >>----------------------------------------- > >>Technical assistance thanks to our friends at http://OnlineGroups.Net > > > > > > -- > > Randy Schenkat > > 1358 Skyline Dr. > > Winona, MN 55987 > > 507-452-7168 > > > > Randy Schenkat > > > > Info about Randy Schenkat: http://forums.e-democracy.org/p/randyschenkat > > > > This topic's messages may be viewed at: > > http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/7qM4aEMqQJTzH7J9JavCbO > > ----------------------------------------- > > To post, send your message to: <email obscured> > > To leave or for daily digest, type "unsubscribe" or "digest on," > > in subject line and send to: <email obscured> > > > > More info about Winona Online Democracy: > > http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/winona > > > > E-Democracy.Org rules: http://e-democracy.org/rules > > ----------------------------------------- > > Technical assistance thanks to our friends at http://OnlineGroups.Net > > > Bob Sebo > East End, Winona > Info about Bob Sebo: http://forums.e-democracy.org/p/bobsebo > > This topic's messages may be viewed at: http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/5fEfV3H4wpUCkCSQwBXbHy > ----------------------------------------- > To post, send your message to: <email obscured> > To leave or for daily digest, type "unsubscribe" or "digest on," > in subject line and send to: <email obscured> > > More info about Winona Online Democracy: > http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/winona > > E-Democracy.Org rules: http://e-democracy.org/rules > ----------------------------------------- > Technical assistance thanks to our friends at http://OnlineGroups.Net ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1515 - Release Date: 6/23/2008 7:16 PM