Major Incident at Critical Mass bike rally
From:
Margaret Hastings
Date:
2007 Sep 01 21:10 UTC
Short link
Good points Jim.
And this Free Speech Working Group? I thought our Constitution already covered
free speech.
The fact that it is deemed necessary to create a group to restrict our rights
to free speech and assembly is truly Orwellian.
Over the years in working on Decriminalization of Homelessness,I have been
struck by the lack of concern by our City Council members, and Mayor, regarding
constitutional rights.along with their basic lack of knowledge or understanding
of these rights.
I also got a good education regarding the back room conversations that take
place among the above to sort out who has the most clout on the council, i.e.
money, connections and influence....usually resulting in disservice to our
community and...yes to our homeless residents.It is sad that the little bit of
power gained by being in the city council, leads to way too much selling out.
The city council and mayor should be championing the rights of free speech and
assembly...not toadying to wealthy interests.
But to paraphrase Wizard (whom I respect very much)..I continue to try to push
that huge boulder up a very large hill.
Kingfield
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Jim McGuire <Seamus@pro-ns.net>
> At 12:50 PM 9/1/2007, Cam Gordon wrote:
> >This is very discouraging and unfortunate. I am looking into what
> >went wrong and will continue to do so and welcome any accounts or
> >observations on or off list. I will also plan on joining the ride
> >again next month and will encourage other policy makers and peace
> >activists to do so as well as Peter wisely suggests.
>
>
> Fascinating response, Cam. I appreciate the fact that you're
> supporting Critical Mass, but isn't CM, in fact, a "group of 25 or
> more who have gathered to express a viewpoint or opinion"? As such,
> wouldn't the ordinance you're supporting require them to have a
> permit to ride every month? (Presumably there would have to be a
> different permit each month, but I'm not certain - please clarify).
>
> If I'm incorrect, and you're not supporting the ordinance proposed by
> the Orwellian named "Free Speech Working Group" then please correct me.
>
> If not - please reconcile how you can support that ordinance and
> still support the Critical Mass ride.
>
> Jim McGuire
> Como
>
>
>
> Jim McGuire
> Como, Minneapolis
> Info about Jim McGuire: http://forums.e-democracy.org/contacts/jimmcguire
>
> This topic's messages may be viewed at:
> http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/8VRusjTW6qM24Qgoracr3
> -----------------------------------------
> To post, send your message to: <email obscured>
> To leave or for daily digest, type "unsubscribe" or "digest on,"
> in subject line and send to: <email obscured>
>
> More info about Minneapolis Issues Forum:
> http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/mpls
>
> E-Democracy.Org rules: http://e-democracy.org/rules
> -----------------------------------------
> Technical assistance thanks to our friends at http://OnlineGroups.Net
>
> 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://e-democracy.org/rules.
> If you think a member is in violation, contact the forum manager at
> <email obscured> before continuing it on the list.
>
> 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
.