Post in Submissions by 5pm today on Coastal Policy Statement Review
Topic Navigation
- First post
- Previous post
- Next post
- Last post
Submissions by 5pm today on Coastal Policy Statement Review From: Brian Sandle Date: May 07 02:12 UTC Short link
Tony Milne wrote: > The NZ Coastal Policy Statement is a key statement of national policy which > guides planning and resource consent decisions for the coastal environment. > The existing statement is currently being reviewed. [...] > > > Why does the review matter? > > > > The NZCPS is a national policy statement under the Resource Management Act > (RMA). Once the new NZCPS is completed, regional and district councils have > to ensure their policy statements and plans give effect to the provisions in > the NZCPS. > > > > The policy can affect any activity in the "coastal environment" - not just > marine areas and the beach, but also adjacent land areas. > > [...] > > > More information about the policy can be found on Doc's website at : > > > > http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=33968 > > Submissions may also be emailed to <email obscured> <mailto:<email obscured>> Your submission should state whether you support or oppose the proposal; any changes that you want made; and reasons for your views. Your submission must state whether or not you wish to be heard on the submission. Your submission should include your name, postal address, phone number and (if applicable) email address. I have a concern that as spread of bird species changes, that exotic trees that otherwise would not have been a habitat then become such. Bellbirds are becoming more frequent in Christchurch, in the New Brighton area. They can use big trees like macrocarpas which are not indigenous. They may make more use of them in future. I do not know if they are here because there is increased food and vegetation for them in the city or whether there is less in the rurla areas. Do you see them in the rural areas? I am a bit worried about Policy 35 of the Statement: "(h) removing redundant structures and materials that lack heritage or amenity value." Could that be taken to mean removing macrocarpas from Thomson Park and planting tussock and ngaois? I have seen a heron in Thomson Park macrocarpas. And I have heard a bell bird in a macrocarpa on Marine Pde near Lonsdale St. Had those trees been removed a few years back before those birds had come to them, then they could not have that habitat now. So I feel foresight somehow needs to be defined. Silvereyes and fantails can use beach areas and gain iodine and protein. They need nearby refuge from the gulls which give them a hurry up. The infill in the New Brighton L3 housing areas when the fuller potential has been moved to often have less bushy areas, though some landscaping is done. So the birds do not have that refuge. Brian Sandle