The Homeless Industrial Complex
6/8/2016 1 Comment
by Debbie Brady
â Denverâs social experiment--the 10 year plan to end homelessness--has run
its course. Ten years ago in 2005, then Mayor Hickenlooper created a new City
agency, Denverâs Road Home. This agency was charged with ending homelessness in
Denver in ten years. This effort has proved to be a dismal failure. There are
many more unhoused folks in the City now than there were 10 years ago.
In fact, according to a recent Denver City Auditorâs report, Denverâs Road
Home has spent $63 million and because of poor record keeping, has no idea of
the results of this expenditure. Denverâs Road Home required all nonprofit
agencies receiving money from the City to report regularly on the results of
their efforts, but Denverâs Road Home failed to compile this information. As a
result they have no idea of which agenciesâ efforts were successful and which
were not.
How many housing units could have been built for $63 million?
This is no way to run a railroad, let alone a City agency.
Bennie Milliner, the Executive Director of Denverâs Road Home, said at a
recent meeting of the Denver Homeless Commission, that the report unfairly
pointed fingers at the service providers. I have read the report and if fingers
were pointed, it was at Denverâs Road Home.
I was homeless in Denver for three years, from 2009 to 2011, in the middle
of this social experiment, and I think I have a pretty good idea of where most
of those millions were spent.
Most of this money went to support what I call, âThe Homeless Industrial
Complex.â While it is true that these service providers are nonprofits, the
people in charge of these charities often earn fairly substantial salaries.
They also employ many people charged with keeping the unwashed masses in line.
By in line, I mean the homeless spend much of their time standing in line for
food or shelter, while they must also toe the line for the often arrogant
guards and officials who run these places or they get thrown out. There is very
little incentive to end homelessness here, when the result of a successful
effort would be the loss of employment for many of them.
Those who are not up to surviving on the streets and are lucky enough to
get into a shelter, are in many cases warehoused in bug infested and sometimes
unsafe crowded dormitories. There they languish with very little effort to
move them from shelters into homes; some of these places more resemble prisons
then safe havens. There are some exceptions that truly care and work to help
move people move into homes and decent paying jobs.
Iâm not going to name names here, but if you work in either of these kinds
of places, you know who you are.
I spent one month in a prison-like shelter before a Veterans Administration
caseworker moved me into one of the exceptions, where I spent seven months
until I was able to move under a roof of my own.
I love my place and intend to die here. If not for the V.A. and HUD I
would still be on the streets or in a shelter. I was lucky. I just hope my luck
holds a few more years, thatâs all I need, Iâm an old lady and Iâll be gone
soon.
Iâve seen the worst and the best of these non profit homeless shelters.
One thing I noticed about them though was that most of the staff drove some
pretty nice cars. You notice these things when you are standing across the
street from the parking lot waiting for a bus.
Iâm not going to talk about the rest of my homeless experience, living on
the streets and in the woods, because I think I may have broken some laws that
the statute of limitations hasnât run out on yet.
The unhoused who cannot stomach living in shelters, brave the elements
living on the street. These folks are regularly harassed by police and the
business ownersâ private cops who see them as a nuisance. In fact, laws have
been passed that make it illegal to perform routine acts of survival in public.
There are no public places where these folks are allowed to pee, poop, rest or
sleep. They are considered outlaws because they dare to exist. The politicians
and the tycoons who control them just want these people to disappear; they
donât care where they disappear to as long as they are not disrupting commerce
downtown.
Even for those folks who can stomach living in a shelter, according to
last yearâs Point In Time (PIT) survey of the homeless in Denver, there is only
one shelter bed for every four homeless people living in Denver. We all know
the PIT survey is always way low. This kind of reminds me of George W Bush in
New Orleans after Katrina. I can just see him now, saying, âYouâre doing a hell
of a job Bennie.â
Many business owners contribute millions of dollars to maintain this
failed system. Why? These guys are supposed to be financial experts. Why donât
they demand more bang for their bucks?
It has been proven in many places worldwide that the most inexpensive way
to end homelessness is to provide the unhoused with homes, a place where they
can perform simple acts of survival behind a locked door. Why is this so hard
for these poobahs to understand? Instead, we have people getting thrown in jail
for daring to try to survive in public, people languishing in shelters which
are often bug infested and unsafe, and the business owners complaining about
unhoused people costing them money by disrupting commerce downtown. All of
these so-called solutions to homelessness cost the city, state and federal
governments a lot of the taxpayersâ hard-earned money. For what?
One of the biggest issues contributing to this situation is our paltry
minimum wage. Many of the people who are homeless work full time at minimum
wage jobs, but are still unable to afford housing in Denverâs out-of-control
housing market. Because of this, there are way too many families with children
living on the streets or crowded into very small living spaces. If they are not
trying to survive on the streets, they can find themselves camped out with
relatives or crammed into overpriced motel rooms, where they are often
unwelcome.
This is again, no way, to run a railroad.
I suppose I could go on and on, bitching about the stupidity of this mess,
but the fact of the matter is, no one who is in a position to do something is
listening.