the Walz administration promotes vaccination but not early treatment. Doctors
in hospitals must follow restrictive treatment protocols that are not very
effective in preventing deaths and long term disability from covid 19.
Early treatment saves lives. You don't have to take my word for that. In August
2921 Anthony Fauci stated that early treatment with monoclonal antibodies can
reduce covid 19 hospitalizations and deaths by up to 85% and that monoclonal
antibodies should be more widely utilized
https://nypost.com/2021/08/24/fauci-early-use-of-monoclonal-antibodies-can-reduce-hospitalization-death/
During the summer's Delta surge in the southern US, the State of Florida
heavily utilized monoclonal antibodies, opening 25 infusion sites around the
state that served over 150,000 people at high risk for severe illness or
moderately severe symptoms early in the course of the illness. This prevented
tens of thousands of hospitalizations and thousands of deaths. Many of those
needing early treatment were fully vaccinated.
The Minnesota Department of Health web site has a link to a monoclonal antibody
infusion center finder with several possible sites and only one verified site
in the entire Twin Cities Metro Area, Hospitals are facing a surge not only of
covid 19 admissions but also a surge of emergency admissions for other acute
illnesses, such as cardiac arrest and strokes. The hospital system doesn't have
the capacity accommodate the expected surge of covid 19 admissions in the
absence of widely publicized and available early treatment,
A recent opinion of the Attorney General of Nebraska stated that doctors are
not in violation of their ethical and legal duty to their patients when
prescribing FDA approved drugs repurposed to treat covid 19. The Nebraska AG
found that data from clinical trials showed that hydroxychloroquine and
Ivermectin have a positive impact on the course of illness, and notes that
these drugs, alone and in combination with other drug are approved for
treatment of covid 19 in many countries.
The United States has 5% of the world's population and 26% of the world's
reported covid 19 deaths. The covid 19 death toll is also disproportionately
high in other countries that greatly restricted or outlawed early early
treatment.
Despite the very high vaccination rate for those over 60 years old and younger
individuals with comorbid conditions and a much lower vaccination rate for
those at lower risk for severe illness, hospitalizations and deaths are not
less skewed toward elderly and medically fragile individual. Per Minnesota
Department of health data as of 3 Nov 2021:
- There have been a total of 25 covid 19 deaths for all individual in
Minnesta under the age of 30 years
- A total of 4 deaths for individual under the age of 19.
- Case fatality rates less than 1 in 1,000 for the 40-44 year age group.
- Case fatality rates a little more than 1% for 60 to 64 year olds,
- over 2% for 65 to 69 year olds,
- 4% for 70 to 74 year olds.
- 12% for 80 to 84 years old, etc.
-
The Minnesota Department of Health has been tracking covid 19 reinfections
since March 2020 and breakthrough infections of the vaccinated since May 2021.
Reinfections for those who recovered from covid 19 over 20 months is 1.1%.ย The
breakthrough infection rate for the fully vaccinated in less than 6 months is
2.2%.ย Keep in mind that the universe of the vaccinated includes many
documented as having recovered from an infection prior to vaccination, plus
many more undocumented cases.
A big study in Israel released for publication in August 2021 showed that
individuals who are vaccinated without a prior infection are 6 to 13 times more
likely to get reinfected and up to 47 times more likely to be hospitalized than
those who recovered from covid 19 and are not vaccinated
Using coercion to get people vaccinated by limited their medical options and
making vaccination a condition of employment makes no sense from a public
health perspective. Even more egregious is to force someone to accept a vaccine
which carries some risk and not medically necessary is problematic.
When Tim Walz declared a state of emergency in March 2020, he ordered a
lockdown as recommended by Donald Trump and his covid 19 task force. Nearly all
governors and many big city mayors did the same. Then, prompted by the CDC,
Walz and most other governors imposed mask mandates. Nonetheless, Walz was
exercising police powers without legislative authorization.
The Minnesota Executive Order statute authorizes the governor to issue
executive orders to state agencies, but not to issue executive orders with the
force of law to the general population.
Under the State of Emergency statutes, the governor may issue an executive
order that conflicts with administrative rules of state agencies and local
laws, but not state laws nor the Minnesota constitution. The state of emergency
statutes authorize the executive branch to quarantine those with symptomatic
infections from communicable diseases, but grants no other authority to
exercise police powers over the general population. The closing of "non
essential businesses" and mask mandates were exercises of police powers without
legislative authority,
Though it can be argued that the intent of the legislature was to grant
emergency powers to protect the public, and there was an emergency, Tim Walz
could lawfully implement recommendations of the CDC and federal covid 19 task
force without a grant of authority. However, the federal executive branch under
Trump nudged governors to violate separation of powers clauses incorporated in
all state constitutions. The US Supreme Court has held that even in an
emergency, the executive branch shall not exercise police powers without
statutory authorization.
"Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or
remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The
Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to
the Federal Government and its limitations of the power of the States were
determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency.
What power was thus granted and what limitations were thus imposed are
questions" [Page 425] 290 U.S. 398Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell (No.
370)Argued: November 8, 9, 1933Decided: January 8, 1934189 Minn. 422, 448; 249
N.W. 334, 893, affirmed.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/09/24/2019-20804/modernizing-influenza-vaccines-in-the-united-states-to-promote-national-security-and-public-health
The Genesis of Operation Warp Speed and the war against democracy and public
health in response to covid 19.
by Doug Mann, 21 November 2021
This executive order, dated 19 Sept 2021 and published in the Federal Registry
5 days later has the finger-prints of Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates all over it.
The goals 1) Switch from a 70 year old egg based manufacturing process to new
technologies such as mRNA, 2) Vaccinate 100% against endemic flu viruses and 3)
Launch a mass vaccination campaign during a pandemic.
Operation Warp Speed represents the execution of the plan of the above
mentioned executive order. The plan for a mass coronavirus vaccination campaign
is impossible to carry out if there are other recognized therapeutic agents
that are safe and effective as an alternative to vaccination. That is why the
FDA advises doctors to not prescribe FDA approved drug repurposed to treat
covid 19. Avoidance of the virus doesn't make the virus less deadly. Early
treatment saves lives and keeps people out of the hosptial. Hospitals also have
very restrictive treatment protocols that are not very effective.
In every respect, the covid pandemic management strategy is at variance with
principles of managing flu pandemics during the past 70 years and is supported
by "new science" tailored to support predetermined interventions. Covid 19 is
much more dangerous to some than others. The coronavirus virus is an airborne
RNA virus much like flu viruses that caused pandemics during the past 70 years.
Immunity from infection is predictably much more robust and durable than
immunity from vaccination alone. Data from contact tracing indicates that
transmission of the virus prior to symptom onset or in the absence of symptoms
is rare, occurring less than 1% of the time [2 April 2020 WHO covid 19 update]
In a modern quarantine, the goal is to isolate the sick, not the general
population as happens with lock downs, which do more harm than good.
The virus is spread by fine aerosols that stay aloft much longer and reach
higher concentrations when indoor air is dry than moist. That is why there is a
seasonal pattern to surges of infections. That is why surgical masks and the
the cloth masks recommended for the general population are not effective as
personal protective equipment nor as source control. Surgical masks reduce fine
aerosol emissions to a very small degree and have long been considered
inappropriate as PPE and source control by the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration and the National Institution for Occupational Safety and Health.
Big Pharma and its captured regulatory agencies play a big supporting role in
this drama. However, there are other players who benefit. There are other
agendas served. There are politicians who are motivated to stay the course
because they contaminated themselves by becoming complicit in crimes against
humanity masquerading as public health policy.
Another casualty of Operation Warp Speed is a nominally democratic government.
The lockdowns and mask and vaccine mandates by governors, mayors and the US
president generally involved an exercise of police powers not authorized by
statute.
"Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or
remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The
Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to
the Federal Government and its limitations of the power of the States were
determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency.
What power was thus granted and what limitations were thus imposed are
questions" [Page 425] 290 U.S. 398Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell (No.
370)Argued: November 8, 9, 1933Decided: January 8, 1934189 Minn. 422, 448; 249
N.W. 334, 893, affirmed.
The Biden vaccine mandates also involve an exercise of police powers to protect
the health and safety of the population that are reserved to the states by the
US constitution.
The campaign against "misinformation" criminalizes dissenting opinions related
to covid 19 policies and is certainly a violation of the first amendment.
Freedom of expression and civil discourse are essential to a functioning
democracy.
The coercion used against doctors to compel them to withhold treatment for
covid 19 and forced vaccination violates medical autonomy, the right of the
individual to make health care decisions. My body, my choice.
The government has been narrowing treatment options to a vaccine or nothing,
and using other, extremely coercive methods which amounts to forced
vaccination, which is legally prohibited, in theory.
The coronavirus vaccines are experimental and to date ha have a horrible safety
record. For those are recovered from covid 19 and most children and young
adults not yet infected, the known risks of the vaccine are greater than the
known risks of infection. Those who are not vaccinated and recovered from covid
19 have more robust and durable immunity than those who are fully vaccinated
and yet to be infected. A goal of vaccinating 100% of the population is not
based on science nor on sound public health principles.