Post in Delays in forum postings
Topic Navigation
Useful Links
Delays in forum postings From: Steven Clift Date: Jan 14 03:20 UTC Short link
As I understand there is a first time e-mail to post delay of 30 minutes as
part of an anti-spam "grey list" feature.
I am not exactly sure why it is 30 minutes. It may be that with the recent
upgrade the greylisting to "white list" feature was reset. Once an e-mail
address successfully posts, the delay should be removed.
Let us know if your continued e-mail to group posts are delayed in a similar
fashion:
<email obscured>
Cheers,
Steven Clift
E-Democracy.Org
David Braund wrote:
> Thanks for this, David, but I've never had a problem e-mailing posts before.
Also I notice that the contents of my re-posting are mostly missing where they
appear on the website. Maybe liftoff have something to say about that...
> > Cheers, > David Braund > ----- Original Message ----- > From: David Botibol > To: David Braund > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 8:39 AM > Subject: Delays in forum postings > > > Hi David, > > After I replied to you something further came to light about your posting not being delivered. Your email "I also posted on this topic" had an address list consisting of Brighton & Hove Issues Forum and myself. The copy destined for my email arrived I think a few seconds after you sent it. The copy destined for the forum took a circuitous route via the Central European Time Zone and the New Zealand Time Zone incurring a 40-minute delay. Below I have pasted email header data showing the route. > > I am inclined to recommend wherever possible using the web interface for direct posting, rather than using the email method, as you have done. The web interface method tends to be immediate. > > Happy posting! > > - David > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Received: from 209.126.222.8 (EHLO vida.onlinegroups.net) (209.126.222.8) > by mta820.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:29:06 +0000 > Received: from vida.onlinegroups.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by vida.onlinegroups.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0998421AF8C; > Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:24:02 +1300 (NZDT) > X-Original-To: <email obscured> > Delivered-To: <email obscured> > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by vida.onlinegroups.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B31021AFF3 > for <<email obscured>>; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:23:49 +1300 (NZDT) > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vida.onlinegroups.net > Received: from vida.onlinegroups.net ([209.126.222.8]) > by localhost (vida.onlinegroups.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) > with ESMTP id sCNp0WJCCUfb for <<email obscured>>; > Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:23:41 +1300 (NZDT) > X-Greylist: delayed 2417 seconds by postgrey-1.30 at vida.onlinegroups.net; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:23:41 NZDT > Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com (smtp5.freeserve.com [193.252.22.152]) > by vida.onlinegroups.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C38B21AF8C > for <<email obscured>>; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:23:40 +1300 (NZDT) > Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com (mwinf3416 [10.232.11.116]) > by mwinf3420.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A351F1C0AF03 > for <<email obscured>>; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:43:27 +0100 (CET) > Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by mwinf3416.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7176D1C00088; > Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:43:22 +0100 (CET) > Received: from raven17 (modem-2503.orangutan.dialup.pol.co.uk [217.135.233.199]) > by mwinf3416.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D097A1C00086; > Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:43:20 +0100 (CET) > X-ME-UUID: <email obscured> > Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.5.516 [269.19.1/1220]); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:44:22 +0000 > Message-ID: <004001c85508$177b1220$<email obscured>> > From: "David Braund" <<email obscured>> > To: "Brighton & Hove Issues Forum" <<email obscured>>, > "David Botibol" <<email obscured>> > References: <<email obscured>> > Subject: Re: [BH-Issues] Argus Article re Gilad Atzmon meeting and Picket - January 7th 7.00 Brighthelm > Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:44:21 -0000 > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: MailBoxer > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; > Precedence: Bulk > List-Post: mailto:<email obscured> > List-Id: bh > X-BeenThere: <email obscured> > X-Loop: <email obscured> > X-Archive-Id: 5wlV4G66xVHQ1B3n8Ft6ag > X-GSUser-Id: davidbraund > X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 7.5.516 [269.19.1/1220] > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: David Botibol > To: David Braund > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 11:24 AM > Subject: Re: [BH-Issues] Argus Article re Gilad Atzmon meeting and Picket - January 7th 7.00 Brighthelm > > > Hi David, > > I'm not sure that I have understood what you are asking. On which forum was your posting not delivered: the SCIP Discussion List, or Brighton & Hove Issues? When posting to either forum I log in to it and use its web interface. That seems to work quicker and with more certainty than sending an email to it. Maybe you sent an email and it was delayed somewhere in the system, or the destination address wasn't correct, or the sending address wasn't the one that you registered. > > Regards, > > - David > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: David Braund > To: Brighton & Hove Issues Forum ; David Botibol > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 10:44 AM > Subject: Re: [BH-Issues] Argus Article re Gilad Atzmon meeting and Picket - January 7th 7.00 Brighthelm > > > I also posted on this topic to this forum a day earlier than you, but unlike > your posting mine does not appear to have been delivered. Why is this? I'm > not aware of any mechanism for one subscriber to prevent publication of a > post to a thread on this forum because they have "moved it" to another > forum. > > Unless it is just that only I have not received a copy, an explanation is > awaited. > > David Braund > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Botibol" <<email obscured>> > To: "Brighton & Hove Issues Forum" <<email obscured>> > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 10:18 AM > Subject: Re: [BH-Issues] Argus Article re Gilad Atzmon meeting and Picket - > January 7th 7.00 Brighthelm > > > > For any readers who wish to follow this topic, Tony G appears to have > moved it to the SCIP Discussion List at > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scip-discussion/message/8868 > > > > David Botibol > > Goldstone Valley, Hove > > Info about David Botibol: > http://forums.e-democracy.org/contacts/botiboldavid > > > > This topic's messages may be viewed at: > http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/qPN0bQKhHJZZMgPUmcOOU > > ----------------------------------------- > > To post, send your message to: <email obscured> > > To leave or for daily digest, type "unsubscribe" or "digest on," > > in subject line and send to: <email obscured> > > > > More info about Brighton & Hove Issues Forum: > > http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/bh > > > > E-Democracy.Org rules: http://e-democracy.org/rules > > ----------------------------------------- > > Technical assistance thanks to our friends at http://OnlineGroups.Net > > > > David Braund > > Info about David Braund: http://forums.e-democracy.org/contacts/davidbraund > > This topic's messages may be viewed at: http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/6m53L1rURI9jn0gnxO8Fmv > ----------------------------------------- > To post, send your message to: <email obscured> > To leave or for daily digest, type "unsubscribe" or "digest on," > in subject line and send to: <email obscured> > > More info about Liftoff - Issues Forums Builders: > http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/liftoff > > E-Democracy.Org rules: http://e-democracy.org/rules > ----------------------------------------- > Technical assistance thanks to our friends at http://OnlineGroups.Net >